The Enlightenment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The discernment - Essay ExampleScientific inventions and scientific discoveries made the hallmark of the knowledge hitch. During the enlightenment period, it was known that science was the subject that could bring transformation in the world (Withers, 2007). The transformation that was desired was that which could start out compassionate keep comfortable and easier on earth. During this period, more goods were produced at reduced cost, the stress of traveling, communicstion was reduced, and mobility was advanced hence the ease of conference and transit. Trade became advanced to different locations and human life ceased to be caged in geographical confines. During this period, there were some criticisms as well as the mushrooming of various organized groups. The church specifically was criticized during this period. The church was criticized by the liberals to take a leak been be confining peoples reason to doctrinal thoughts. The thought of the enlightenment age proposed a m ore secern system that does not constrict people to a particular system of belief. Enlightenement period was a period of enquiry and people pauperismed logical reasons and proof behind phenomena. At this time, people did not want to set their belief on speculations because they were propounded by the church or by such authorities the like Plato they cherished scientific truth (Pancaldi, 2003). This though and desire led to the attack of absolutist and mercantilism. The think tanks of the enlightenment age refused to believe and accept some dominating dogmas. They could not any scientific proof to make them believe that the monarchs had superior status than new(prenominal) human beings. They could further not find scientific cellular inclusion that there is a class of people set a part to dominate other human race because they were set a part to claim sovereignty over others. Thinkers of the enlightenment age wanted proof beyond any reasonable doubt that mercantilism was of eco nomic benefit. 2. Compare and contrast the manipulation played by Danton and Robespierre during the terror Danton and Robespierre, had great influence in shaping human history. Both of these personalities were leadership to be reckoned with. They had major differences in belief and though a thing which later led to the spilt of policy-making stances. Robespierre strongly believed that a nation would be a better republic only if it was governed on the formula and the foundations of philosophy, virtue, and justice. Danton on the other hand strongly advocated for a nation that is ruled in the basis of nobility, tradition, and domestic help agreement and peace. Each of these figures of power supported the course that they believed was in the best interest of the people and no(prenominal) was willing to sacrifice their though to accommodate that of the other (Gascoigne, 1989). Their opposing belief became personal that they could not invite each other. They had strong hatred for e ach other until when revolution came to them, an opportunity to destroy each other presented itself. During the Terror period, Danton was elected in the Public Safety committee. While he was serving in the committee, Danton seek to reconcile the parties that were conflicting with the min intension of restoring peace and enforcing the rule of law to take effect in nations. Danton hoped to bring stability during the revolution by adopting a new constitution. The second committee of the public galosh under the leadership of Robespierre stood upright with a declaration to continue terror until the